anti-elab-2802 DCCC268/2022

文件編號:

anti-elab-2802

案件編號:

DCCC268/2022

控罪:

沒有

涉事日期 :

2019-08-01

涉事地點 :

Fo Tan

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that on the evening of 1 August 2019, the police raided warehouses in two industrial buildings in Sha Tin where a large quantity of offensive and defensive equipment, radio communication devices and explosive materials were stored. Four defendants were stopped at the scene, and items including smoke bombs containing potassium chlorate and ammonium chloride, petrol bomb accelerants, trekking poles, baseball bats and spray paint were found at one of the defendants’ residences and two units. The four defendants pleaded guilty to all charges except one relating to radio communication equipment, which was withdrawn; the remaining charges involved possession of offensive weapons in a public place, possession of articles with intent to damage property, and possession of explosives.

Each offence is subject to a maximum imprisonment of 3 years for offensive weapons under section 33 of the Public Order Ordinance, 14 years for possession of explosives under section 55 of the Criminal Offences Ordinance, and 7 years for criminal damage; the sentencing starting point in the District Court takes into account the quantity and nature of the items and the socio-political context.

The court considered the serious violent conflicts in society at the time, the large volume of radical protest materials intended for others to use in making petrol bombs or attacks, the defendants’ guilty pleas and other mitigating factors.

The judge held that by assisting in the storage and distribution of weapons and explosive materials, the defendants clearly facilitated violent protests; their conduct requires a highly punitive and deterrent sentence, otherwise it would be difficult to prevent a recurrence of similar situations.

In the end, the four defendants were sentenced as follows: Defendant One to a total of 28 months’ imprisonment (part of which is to be served concurrently and in installments), Defendant Two to 16 months, Defendant Three to 38 months, and Defendant Four to 16 months’ imprisonment. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

案件資料

文件編號 anti-elab-2802
案件編號 DCCC268/2022
裁判官/法官 KWOK Kai On, Anthony
法院 District Court No. 39
是否認罪 Plead guilty
裁決 Convicted
判刑 Imprisonment
涉事日期 2019-08-01
涉事地點 Fo Tan
判決理由書(AI撮要) No Reasons for Verdict.
判刑理由書 查看
判刑理由書(AI撮要) The judgment states that on the evening of 1 August 2019, the police raided warehouses in two industrial buildings in Sha Tin where a large quantity of offensive and defensive equipment, radio communication devices and explosive materials were stored. Four defendants were stopped at the scene, and items including smoke bombs containing potassium chlorate and ammonium chloride, petrol bomb accelerants, trekking poles, baseball bats and spray paint were found at one of the defendants’ residences and two units. The four defendants pleaded guilty to all charges except one relating to radio communication equipment, which was withdrawn; the remaining charges involved possession of offensive weapons in a public place, possession of articles with intent to damage property, and possession of explosives.</p><p>Each offence is subject to a maximum imprisonment of 3 years for offensive weapons under section 33 of the Public Order Ordinance, 14 years for possession of explosives under section 55 of the Criminal Offences Ordinance, and 7 years for criminal damage; the sentencing starting point in the District Court takes into account the quantity and nature of the items and the socio-political context.</p><p>The court considered the serious violent conflicts in society at the time, the large volume of radical protest materials intended for others to use in making petrol bombs or attacks, the defendants’ guilty pleas and other mitigating factors.</p><p>The judge held that by assisting in the storage and distribution of weapons and explosive materials, the defendants clearly facilitated violent protests; their conduct requires a highly punitive and deterrent sentence, otherwise it would be difficult to prevent a recurrence of similar situations.</p><p>In the end, the four defendants were sentenced as follows: Defendant One to a total of 28 months’ imprisonment (part of which is to be served concurrently and in installments), Defendant Two to 16 months, Defendant Three to 38 months, and Defendant Four to 16 months’ imprisonment. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

KWOK Kai On, Anthony

法院:

District Court No. 39

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件