anti-elab-85 DCCC771/2020 Riot

文件編號:

anti-elab-85

案件編號:

DCCC771/2020

控罪:

Riot

涉事日期 :

2019-11-12

涉事地點 :

Central

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

The judgment states that from 12:00 noon to 3:40 pm on 12 November 2019, thousands of protesters launched the “Lunch with You” protest around the junction of Pedder Street, Des Voeux Road Central and Connaught Road Central in Central. They occupied and paralysed the roads, set fires, erected roadblocks, and damaged buses and shops. The police issued multiple unlawful assembly warnings and fired tear gas. Defendants 3, 5 and 9 were present in the area, wearing masks and carrying umbrellas, bricks and other protest equipment. They fled when the police dispersed the crowd but were ultimately arrested at an emergency exit of Landmark and charged respectively with rioting and using facial coverings in an unlawful assembly, among other offences.

In accordance with the elements and progressive mechanism for unlawful assembly and rioting under sections 18 and 19 of the Public Order Ordinance, and applying the Prohibition on Face Coverings Regulation under section 241K of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance.

The judge found that the defendants intentionally remained in the core area of the riot, chanted slogans with the crowd, picked up and transported bricks, and wore masks to avoid identification. Their explanations were unconvincing and defied common sense; the cumulative effect of the circumstantial evidence was strong enough to prove their participation in and support for the riot.

The three defendants were not innocent bystanders but ‘deliberate stayers’ who came prepared, actively participated in and encouraged the riot. There was no reasonable excuse for masking, and the evidence was conclusive; they should be convicted.

Convicted all three defendants of rioting (Charge 1) and convicted defendants 5 and 9 of using facial coverings in a prohibited unlawful assembly (Charges 6 and 10). Defendant 3 was also found guilty of breaching the Prohibition on Face Coverings Regulation (Charge 4) following a plea, with sentencing to be determined. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判決理由書/裁決書

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

No Reasons for sentence. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-85
Case No. DCCC771/2020
Judge Hui Shiu-keung Peter
Court District Court
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Riot
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2019-11-12
Incident Location Central
Reasons for Verdict View
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) The judgment states that from 12:00 noon to 3:40 pm on 12 November 2019, thousands of protesters launched the "Lunch with You" protest around the junction of Pedder Street, Des Voeux Road Central and Connaught Road Central in Central. They occupied and paralysed the roads, set fires, erected roadblocks, and damaged buses and shops. The police issued multiple unlawful assembly warnings and fired tear gas. Defendants 3, 5 and 9 were present in the area, wearing masks and carrying umbrellas, bricks and other protest equipment. They fled when the police dispersed the crowd but were ultimately arrested at an emergency exit of Landmark and charged respectively with rioting and using facial coverings in an unlawful assembly, among other offences.</p><p>In accordance with the elements and progressive mechanism for unlawful assembly and rioting under sections 18 and 19 of the Public Order Ordinance, and applying the Prohibition on Face Coverings Regulation under section 241K of the Emergency Regulations Ordinance.</p><p>The judge found that the defendants intentionally remained in the core area of the riot, chanted slogans with the crowd, picked up and transported bricks, and wore masks to avoid identification. Their explanations were unconvincing and defied common sense; the cumulative effect of the circumstantial evidence was strong enough to prove their participation in and support for the riot.</p><p>The three defendants were not innocent bystanders but 'deliberate stayers' who came prepared, actively participated in and encouraged the riot. There was no reasonable excuse for masking, and the evidence was conclusive; they should be convicted.</p><p>Convicted all three defendants of rioting (Charge 1) and convicted defendants 5 and 9 of using facial coverings in a prohibited unlawful assembly (Charges 6 and 10). Defendant 3 was also found guilty of breaching the Prohibition on Face Coverings Regulation (Charge 4) following a plea, with sentencing to be determined. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) No Reasons for sentence. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Hui Shiu-keung Peter

法院:

District Court

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件