anti-elab-95 DCCC508/2020 Riot

文件編號:

anti-elab-95

案件編號:

DCCC508/2020

控罪:

Riot

涉事日期 :

2019-11-12

涉事地點 :

Causeway Bay

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that on the evening of 12 November 2019, the defendant and another defendant, together with about thirty masked protesters, surrounded a 21-year-old male student at the demonstration site outside Sogo Department Store in Causeway Bay, mistakenly believing him to be an undercover police officer, forced him to open his rucksack for inspection and seized his belongings. The group then attacked the victim repeatedly with fists, kicks and umbrellas for two to three minutes. During this time, the defendant first pulled others away who were protecting the victim, then joined the crowd in the assault, causing the victim to suffer contusions to his ear and multiple haematomas on his scalp, and lose his mobile phone and identity documents; the assault was recorded by CCTV and news media.

This case involves the offences of riot and wounding, for which there are no established sentencing guidelines. The judgment, citing the Court of Appeal’s view, holds that sentencing for riot must balance upholding the rule of law, public order and deterrence, and typically immediate custody is appropriate, with a suitable starting point of 42 months’ imprisonment; sentencing for wounding is determined according to its statutory penalty.

The court considered that the violence in this case was grave, involved numerous participants and was organised, using umbrellas as cover and weapons, resulting in a serious assault on the victim causing bodily injury and property loss. The defendant’s favourable guilty plea, good background and lack of previous convictions warranted a reduction of the sentence from the starting point to 28 months, with a further discretionary reduction of two months.

The judge considered that such use of violence to suppress dissent, undermining the rule of law and social order, is tantamount to tyranny, severely damages Hong Kong’s reputation, must not be condoned, must be severely punished and send a clear message to the public.

The defendant was sentenced to 26 months’ imprisonment for each of the offences of riot and wounding, with the sentences to be served concurrently, totalling 26 months’ imprisonment. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-95
Case No. DCCC508/2020
Judge LIN Kam Hung, Ernest
Court District Court
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Riot
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2019-11-12
Incident Location Causeway Bay
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that on the evening of 12 November 2019, the defendant and another defendant, together with about thirty masked protesters, surrounded a 21-year-old male student at the demonstration site outside Sogo Department Store in Causeway Bay, mistakenly believing him to be an undercover police officer, forced him to open his rucksack for inspection and seized his belongings. The group then attacked the victim repeatedly with fists, kicks and umbrellas for two to three minutes. During this time, the defendant first pulled others away who were protecting the victim, then joined the crowd in the assault, causing the victim to suffer contusions to his ear and multiple haematomas on his scalp, and lose his mobile phone and identity documents; the assault was recorded by CCTV and news media.</p><p>This case involves the offences of riot and wounding, for which there are no established sentencing guidelines. The judgment, citing the Court of Appeal's view, holds that sentencing for riot must balance upholding the rule of law, public order and deterrence, and typically immediate custody is appropriate, with a suitable starting point of 42 months' imprisonment; sentencing for wounding is determined according to its statutory penalty.</p><p>The court considered that the violence in this case was grave, involved numerous participants and was organised, using umbrellas as cover and weapons, resulting in a serious assault on the victim causing bodily injury and property loss. The defendant's favourable guilty plea, good background and lack of previous convictions warranted a reduction of the sentence from the starting point to 28 months, with a further discretionary reduction of two months.</p><p>The judge considered that such use of violence to suppress dissent, undermining the rule of law and social order, is tantamount to tyranny, severely damages Hong Kong's reputation, must not be condoned, must be severely punished and send a clear message to the public.</p><p>The defendant was sentenced to 26 months' imprisonment for each of the offences of riot and wounding, with the sentences to be served concurrently, totalling 26 months' imprisonment. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

LIN Kam Hung, Ernest

法院:

District Court

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件