anti-elab-10 DCCC317/2021 Assault police officer

文件編號:

anti-elab-10

案件編號:

DCCC317/2021

控罪:

Assault police officer

涉事日期 :

2019-09-29

涉事地點 :

Causeway Bay

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment stated that on 29 September 2019 at the junction of Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Gap Road in Causeway Bay, the defendant, together with other unidentified individuals, blocked the road, threw petrol bombs and glass bottles, confronted the police and took part in a riot; during the incident, the defendant wielded a walking stick and a laser pointer, struck at officers carrying out their duties with the stick, and had spray paint cans and an unlicensed walkie-talkie in his backpack, intending to destroy property and communicate illegally, and was ultimately subdued and arrested by the police.

According to the Riot offence, the maximum penalty is ten years’ imprisonment, and reference is made to the Court of Appeal guidelines in considering the degree of premeditation, the number of participants, the level of violence, the use of weapons, and the social impact; additionally, offences involving weapons and items are sentenced according to their lethality and intent, while the offence of unlicensed communication devices is generally dealt with by a fine.

The defendant was a first-time offender with no prior convictions, pleaded guilty after committal for trial, and received sentence reductions of between one-quarter and one-third; throughout this period he expressed deep remorse, had a strong academic and employment background, and received family support, all of which were factors considered in sentencing.

In this case the riot was of moderate-to-mild scale and duration, did not cause serious injuries or significant property damage; the defendant did not play a leading role and the weapons had limited lethality; considering his family responsibilities and the ongoing stress of awaiting trial, the sentence may be moderately reduced.

The defendant was convicted of four offences, rioting, possession of an offensive weapon, possession of items with intent to destroy property, and unlicensed possession of a radio communication device (the assaulting an officer offence was filed); the sentences for these offences were ordered to run concurrently, resulting in a total term of 33 months’ imprisonment, and a fine of HK$2,000 was imposed for the unlicensed communication device offence. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-10
Case No. DCCC317/2021
Judge Hui Shiu-keung Peter
Court District Court
Verdict Discontinuation
Charge Assault police officer
Incident Date 2019-09-29
Incident Location Causeway Bay
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment stated that on 29 September 2019 at the junction of Leighton Road and Wong Nai Chung Gap Road in Causeway Bay, the defendant, together with other unidentified individuals, blocked the road, threw petrol bombs and glass bottles, confronted the police and took part in a riot; during the incident, the defendant wielded a walking stick and a laser pointer, struck at officers carrying out their duties with the stick, and had spray paint cans and an unlicensed walkie-talkie in his backpack, intending to destroy property and communicate illegally, and was ultimately subdued and arrested by the police.</p><p>According to the Riot offence, the maximum penalty is ten years’ imprisonment, and reference is made to the Court of Appeal guidelines in considering the degree of premeditation, the number of participants, the level of violence, the use of weapons, and the social impact; additionally, offences involving weapons and items are sentenced according to their lethality and intent, while the offence of unlicensed communication devices is generally dealt with by a fine.</p><p>The defendant was a first-time offender with no prior convictions, pleaded guilty after committal for trial, and received sentence reductions of between one-quarter and one-third; throughout this period he expressed deep remorse, had a strong academic and employment background, and received family support, all of which were factors considered in sentencing.</p><p>In this case the riot was of moderate-to-mild scale and duration, did not cause serious injuries or significant property damage; the defendant did not play a leading role and the weapons had limited lethality; considering his family responsibilities and the ongoing stress of awaiting trial, the sentence may be moderately reduced.</p><p>The defendant was convicted of four offences, rioting, possession of an offensive weapon, possession of items with intent to destroy property, and unlicensed possession of a radio communication device (the assaulting an officer offence was filed); the sentences for these offences were ordered to run concurrently, resulting in a total term of 33 months’ imprisonment, and a fine of HK$2,000 was imposed for the unlicensed communication device offence. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Hui Shiu-keung Peter

法院:

District Court

認罪:

沒有

罪成:

Discontinuation

判刑:

沒有

相近案件