anti-elab-2632 DCCC617/2021 Riot

文件編號:

anti-elab-2632

案件編號:

DCCC617/2021

控罪:

Riot

涉事日期 :

2019-11-19

涉事地點 :

Tsim Sha Tsui

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that the PolyU incident occurred from 17 to 18 November 2019, during which protesters occupied the campus and rioted inside and outside the premises. Despite multiple police warnings to disperse, the situation remained unresolved. Defendants 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 18, knowing the scene was a riot, remained on site, joining the rioting crowd to bolster its numbers; Defendant 9 also assaulted a police officer, causing minor injuries; Defendants 7 and 12 used face coverings during the illegal assembly.

The Court of Appeal held that the starting point for a riot sentence should not be less than three years’ imprisonment, with sentencing to consider the scale of the riot, the degree of violence, social harm and the defendant’s level of participation, and must be deterrent.

This Court regards each defendant as having the lowest level of participation, thus setting the starting point for the riot offence at three years’ imprisonment, with a 21% to 22% discount for early guilty pleas; an additional two-month reduction for those under 21 years old; for Defendant 9, the starting point for the assaulting a police officer offence is five years, which, after discount, is to be served consecutively with the riot sentence.

The judge considers that although there is no evidence the defendants themselves used violence, they remained at the scene in support of the riot, and must bear serious criminal liability for the destruction and injuries; age and guilty plea are mitigating factors, but the scope for reduction is limited.

Defendant 3 was sentenced to 26 months and two weeks’ imprisonment; Defendant 4 to 33 months; Defendant 6 to 28 months; Defendant 7 to 33 months; Defendant 9 to 56 months and three weeks for the combined sentences for riot and assaulting a police officer; Defendant 10 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 11 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 12 to 34 months; Defendant 13 to 35 months; Defendant 15 to 28 months; Defendant 16 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 18 to 28 months and two weeks. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-2632
Case No. DCCC617/2021
Judge LAM Wai Kuen, Josiah
Court District Court No. 23
Verdict Convicted
Charge Riot
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2019-11-19
Incident Location Tsim Sha Tsui
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that the PolyU incident occurred from 17 to 18 November 2019, during which protesters occupied the campus and rioted inside and outside the premises. Despite multiple police warnings to disperse, the situation remained unresolved. Defendants 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 18, knowing the scene was a riot, remained on site, joining the rioting crowd to bolster its numbers; Defendant 9 also assaulted a police officer, causing minor injuries; Defendants 7 and 12 used face coverings during the illegal assembly.</p><p>The Court of Appeal held that the starting point for a riot sentence should not be less than three years' imprisonment, with sentencing to consider the scale of the riot, the degree of violence, social harm and the defendant's level of participation, and must be deterrent.</p><p>This Court regards each defendant as having the lowest level of participation, thus setting the starting point for the riot offence at three years' imprisonment, with a 21% to 22% discount for early guilty pleas; an additional two-month reduction for those under 21 years old; for Defendant 9, the starting point for the assaulting a police officer offence is five years, which, after discount, is to be served consecutively with the riot sentence.</p><p>The judge considers that although there is no evidence the defendants themselves used violence, they remained at the scene in support of the riot, and must bear serious criminal liability for the destruction and injuries; age and guilty plea are mitigating factors, but the scope for reduction is limited.</p><p>Defendant 3 was sentenced to 26 months and two weeks' imprisonment; Defendant 4 to 33 months; Defendant 6 to 28 months; Defendant 7 to 33 months; Defendant 9 to 56 months and three weeks for the combined sentences for riot and assaulting a police officer; Defendant 10 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 11 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 12 to 34 months; Defendant 13 to 35 months; Defendant 15 to 28 months; Defendant 16 to 26 months and two weeks; Defendant 18 to 28 months and two weeks. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

LAM Wai Kuen, Josiah

法院:

District Court No. 23

認罪:

沒有

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件