anti-elab-2674 DCCC203/2021 Riot

文件編號:

anti-elab-2674

案件編號:

DCCC203/2021

控罪:

Riot

涉事日期 :

2019-11-18

涉事地點 :

PolyU (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment stated that the defendant, on 2019年11月18日 in the vicinity of Cheung Wan Road outside The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, joined an organised group of about 100 protesters, opened umbrellas to erect roadblocks, threw petrol bombs, shot arrows and hurled bricks at police lines, and broke out of the campus to escape before the police cordon was established. The defendant pleaded guilty to the amended Count 4 of rioting; the original Count 1 was withdrawn.

Under Cap.245 of the Public Order Ordinance, the maximum sentence for rioting is 10 years’ imprisonment. Court of Appeal precedents state that sentencing should consider whether the offence was premeditated, the number of participants, the use of weapons, the scale and duration, the consequences, the defendant’s role and any subsequent conduct after warning, with 6 years as the starting point.

The defendant was part of a large-scale organised riot, participated in the breakout attempt and used high-risk violent means to confront law enforcement, posing a serious threat to public safety; moreover, having previously been convicted of rioting, he is a recidivist, so the sentencing starting point was increased to 78 months; as the defendant pleaded guilty at an early stage, a discretionary reduction was applied to 52 months, and according to the principle of concurrent sentences, the term is set at 24 months.

The court held that rioting is a serious offence and must be met with a highly deterrent sentence to maintain social order and the safety of law enforcement personnel; the defendant’s good background and political views do not constitute mitigating factors.

The defendant was ultimately sentenced to 24 months’ immediate imprisonment, to be served concurrently with cases DCCC410/2020 and 35/2021. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-2674
Case No. DCCC203/2021
Judge Mrs. TSE CHING Adriana Noelle
Court District Court No. 23
Verdict Convicted
Charge Riot
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2019-11-18
Incident Location PolyU (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment stated that the defendant, on 2019年11月18日 in the vicinity of Cheung Wan Road outside The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, joined an organised group of about 100 protesters, opened umbrellas to erect roadblocks, threw petrol bombs, shot arrows and hurled bricks at police lines, and broke out of the campus to escape before the police cordon was established. The defendant pleaded guilty to the amended Count 4 of rioting; the original Count 1 was withdrawn.</p><p>Under Cap.245 of the Public Order Ordinance, the maximum sentence for rioting is 10 years' imprisonment. Court of Appeal precedents state that sentencing should consider whether the offence was premeditated, the number of participants, the use of weapons, the scale and duration, the consequences, the defendant's role and any subsequent conduct after warning, with 6 years as the starting point.</p><p>The defendant was part of a large-scale organised riot, participated in the breakout attempt and used high-risk violent means to confront law enforcement, posing a serious threat to public safety; moreover, having previously been convicted of rioting, he is a recidivist, so the sentencing starting point was increased to 78 months; as the defendant pleaded guilty at an early stage, a discretionary reduction was applied to 52 months, and according to the principle of concurrent sentences, the term is set at 24 months.</p><p>The court held that rioting is a serious offence and must be met with a highly deterrent sentence to maintain social order and the safety of law enforcement personnel; the defendant's good background and political views do not constitute mitigating factors.</p><p>The defendant was ultimately sentenced to 24 months' immediate imprisonment, to be served concurrently with cases DCCC410/2020 and 35/2021. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Mrs. TSE CHING Adriana Noelle

法院:

District Court No. 23

認罪:

沒有

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件