anti-elab-2785 DCCC203/2021 Riot

文件編號:

anti-elab-2785

案件編號:

DCCC203/2021

控罪:

Riot

涉事日期 :

2019-11-18

涉事地點 :

PolyU (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that on 18 November 2019 the defendant was located on Cheong Wan Road outside The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and together with about 100 protesters attempted to break through the university’s main entrance. This riot was part of a large-scale operation spanning several days. The protesters had set up roadblocks and checkpoints on campus, damaged CCTV cameras and campus facilities, and used petrol bombs, bows and arrows and other weapons against the police. Despite multiple warnings from the government and the police, they were unable to stop the violence, and the police eventually cordoned off the site and arrested the defendant and other protesters.

The offence of rioting carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment. Referring to the principles established by the Court of Appeal in cases such as Yang Ka-lun and Leung Tin-kei, the starting point for sentencing is generally 5 to 6 years, and may be increased in particularly serious cases.

In this case the riot was organised and premeditated. The protesters used petrol bombs, bows and arrows and other hard objects to attack the police; more than one hundred people were involved, the conduct lasted several days and caused serious public disorder. The defendant reoffended after being granted bail in a previous riot case, which is an aggravating factor. The defendant pleaded guilty promptly and received the maximum reduction for an early plea.

A sentence for rioting must be punitive and deterrent, and participants in collective conduct must bear joint responsibility. Although the defendant did not occupy a leadership role, he acted in concert with the group, and the sentence must reflect the overall level of violence. It is impermissible to base sentencing on unproven facts.

The judge ultimately ruled that the defendant be sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment for the rioting offence in this case, to be served consecutively with the term imposed in the previous related case. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-2785
Case No. DCCC203/2021
Judge Mrs. TSE CHING Adriana Noelle
Court District Court No. 6
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Riot
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2019-11-18
Incident Location PolyU (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that on 18 November 2019 the defendant was located on Cheong Wan Road outside The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and together with about 100 protesters attempted to break through the university’s main entrance. This riot was part of a large-scale operation spanning several days. The protesters had set up roadblocks and checkpoints on campus, damaged CCTV cameras and campus facilities, and used petrol bombs, bows and arrows and other weapons against the police. Despite multiple warnings from the government and the police, they were unable to stop the violence, and the police eventually cordoned off the site and arrested the defendant and other protesters.</p><p>The offence of rioting carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment. Referring to the principles established by the Court of Appeal in cases such as Yang Ka-lun and Leung Tin-kei, the starting point for sentencing is generally 5 to 6 years, and may be increased in particularly serious cases.</p><p>In this case the riot was organised and premeditated. The protesters used petrol bombs, bows and arrows and other hard objects to attack the police; more than one hundred people were involved, the conduct lasted several days and caused serious public disorder. The defendant reoffended after being granted bail in a previous riot case, which is an aggravating factor. The defendant pleaded guilty promptly and received the maximum reduction for an early plea.</p><p>A sentence for rioting must be punitive and deterrent, and participants in collective conduct must bear joint responsibility. Although the defendant did not occupy a leadership role, he acted in concert with the group, and the sentence must reflect the overall level of violence. It is impermissible to base sentencing on unproven facts.</p><p>The judge ultimately ruled that the defendant be sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment for the rioting offence in this case, to be served consecutively with the term imposed in the previous related case. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Mrs. TSE CHING Adriana Noelle

法院:

District Court No. 6

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件