anti-elab-3009 DCCC65/2021 Unlawful assembly

文件編號:

anti-elab-3009

案件編號:

DCCC65/2021

控罪:

Unlawful assembly

涉事日期 :

2020-05-24

涉事地點 :

Causeway Bay

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that on the day of the incident, about several thousand protesters held an unauthorised march in Causeway Bay, during which they blocked roads, set fires and damaged shops. The victim was walking alone along Leighton Road when he criticised the protesters, after which he was assaulted by a group of about 15 people, including four of the defendants, using umbrellas, hard objects and bare hands, resulting in multiple lacerations and bruises. The defendants later each pleaded guilty either after being cautioned by the police or upon the court’s ruling.

According to Court of Appeal precedents, sentencing for the offence of riot must consider the degree of violence, number of participants, use of weapons, scale and duration; for unlawful assembly and intent to harm, similar considerations apply, including violence, planning and severity of injuries.

In this case, the assembly and riot were premeditated rather than spontaneous; the assault was sudden and brutal; the victim was isolated and left undefended, sustaining serious injuries; the defendants mutually incited each other. Therefore, a high starting point must be adopted, with deductions for guilty pleas, individual roles and background factors.

Although the defendants showed remorse and had good backgrounds, emphasis must be placed on deterrence and maintaining social order; youth alone is not a primary reason for mitigation.

Sentence: Defendant One was sentenced to 34 months’ imprisonment for riot (including 29 months concurrent for assault); Defendant Two to a total of 25 months’ imprisonment for unlawful assembly and assault; Defendant Three to a total of 19 months’ imprisonment for unlawful assembly and assault; Defendant Four was dealt with as a juvenile, ordered to be sent to a training centre for eighteen months, with a three-year supervision order. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-3009
Case No. DCCC65/2021
Judge Tang Siu-hung Daniel
Court District Court No. 20
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Unlawful assembly
Sentence Training Centre
Incident Date 2020-05-24
Incident Location Causeway Bay
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that on the day of the incident, about several thousand protesters held an unauthorised march in Causeway Bay, during which they blocked roads, set fires and damaged shops. The victim was walking alone along Leighton Road when he criticised the protesters, after which he was assaulted by a group of about 15 people, including four of the defendants, using umbrellas, hard objects and bare hands, resulting in multiple lacerations and bruises. The defendants later each pleaded guilty either after being cautioned by the police or upon the court’s ruling.</p><p>According to Court of Appeal precedents, sentencing for the offence of riot must consider the degree of violence, number of participants, use of weapons, scale and duration; for unlawful assembly and intent to harm, similar considerations apply, including violence, planning and severity of injuries.</p><p>In this case, the assembly and riot were premeditated rather than spontaneous; the assault was sudden and brutal; the victim was isolated and left undefended, sustaining serious injuries; the defendants mutually incited each other. Therefore, a high starting point must be adopted, with deductions for guilty pleas, individual roles and background factors.</p><p>Although the defendants showed remorse and had good backgrounds, emphasis must be placed on deterrence and maintaining social order; youth alone is not a primary reason for mitigation.</p><p>Sentence: Defendant One was sentenced to 34 months' imprisonment for riot (including 29 months concurrent for assault); Defendant Two to a total of 25 months' imprisonment for unlawful assembly and assault; Defendant Three to a total of 19 months' imprisonment for unlawful assembly and assault; Defendant Four was dealt with as a juvenile, ordered to be sent to a training centre for eighteen months, with a three-year supervision order. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Tang Siu-hung Daniel

法院:

District Court No. 20

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Training Centre

相近案件