anti-elab-3013 DCCC65/2021 Wounding with intent

文件編號:

anti-elab-3013

案件編號:

DCCC65/2021

控罪:

Wounding with intent

涉事日期 :

2020-05-24

涉事地點 :

Causeway Bay

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that in 2021 the four defendants participated in an unauthorised procession in Causeway Bay. They first disrupted public order by obstructing roads and damaging shops; a conflict later arose when a passer-by criticised the protesters. The protesters, including the four defendants, surrounded the individual from behind and repeatedly assaulted him with umbrellas, hard objects and bare hands, causing multiple lacerations and bruises to his head, back and limbs. Defendants two to four pleaded guilty before trial to unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; defendant one, following the court’s verdict, also admitted to riot and wounding charges.

The court determined the sentencing starting point by reference to the maximum penalties for riot, unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; the Court of Appeal’s principles of punishment and deterrence for riot and unlawful assembly; and factors for wounding with intent such as the degree of harm, the weapons used, premeditation and collective action.

A starting point of 36 months was set for the offences of riot and wounding with intent, and 30 months for unlawful assembly; after considering the defendants’ level of involvement, timing of their pleas, lack of prior convictions, genuine remorse and low risk of reoffending, appropriate reductions were applied respectively; the first defendant, having initiated the assault, received only a minor reduction after an increase; the second and third defendants received reductions for early pleas and personal backgrounds; the fourth defendant, being underage, was ordered to a correctional training centre.

The judge held that although the defendants acted on impulse, were not habitual offenders and showed remorse, their conduct involved large-scale violence causing serious injuries, and it was necessary to impose a sufficient sentence to achieve deterrence, while also considering youth rehabilitation and their family backgrounds.

1. The first defendant was sentenced to a total of 34 months’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently for the offences of riot and wounding with intent; 2. The second defendant was sentenced to a total of 25 months’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; 3. The third defendant was sentenced to a total of 19 months’ imprisonment, to be served concurrently for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; 4. The fourth defendant was committed to a correctional training centre for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent, to remain for at least one and a half years, with an additional three-year supervision order. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-3013
Case No. DCCC65/2021
Judge Tang Siu-hung Daniel
Court District Court No. 20
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Wounding with intent
Sentence Training Centre
Incident Date 2020-05-24
Incident Location Causeway Bay
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that in 2021 the four defendants participated in an unauthorised procession in Causeway Bay. They first disrupted public order by obstructing roads and damaging shops; a conflict later arose when a passer-by criticised the protesters. The protesters, including the four defendants, surrounded the individual from behind and repeatedly assaulted him with umbrellas, hard objects and bare hands, causing multiple lacerations and bruises to his head, back and limbs. Defendants two to four pleaded guilty before trial to unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; defendant one, following the court's verdict, also admitted to riot and wounding charges.</p><p>The court determined the sentencing starting point by reference to the maximum penalties for riot, unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; the Court of Appeal's principles of punishment and deterrence for riot and unlawful assembly; and factors for wounding with intent such as the degree of harm, the weapons used, premeditation and collective action.</p><p>A starting point of 36 months was set for the offences of riot and wounding with intent, and 30 months for unlawful assembly; after considering the defendants' level of involvement, timing of their pleas, lack of prior convictions, genuine remorse and low risk of reoffending, appropriate reductions were applied respectively; the first defendant, having initiated the assault, received only a minor reduction after an increase; the second and third defendants received reductions for early pleas and personal backgrounds; the fourth defendant, being underage, was ordered to a correctional training centre.</p><p>The judge held that although the defendants acted on impulse, were not habitual offenders and showed remorse, their conduct involved large-scale violence causing serious injuries, and it was necessary to impose a sufficient sentence to achieve deterrence, while also considering youth rehabilitation and their family backgrounds.</p><p>1. The first defendant was sentenced to a total of 34 months' imprisonment, to be served concurrently for the offences of riot and wounding with intent; 2. The second defendant was sentenced to a total of 25 months' imprisonment, to be served concurrently for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; 3. The third defendant was sentenced to a total of 19 months' imprisonment, to be served concurrently for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent; 4. The fourth defendant was committed to a correctional training centre for unlawful assembly and wounding with intent, to remain for at least one and a half years, with an additional three-year supervision order. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Tang Siu-hung Daniel

法院:

District Court No. 20

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Training Centre

相近案件