anti-elab-3012 DCCC65/2021 Wounding with intent

文件編號:

anti-elab-3012

案件編號:

DCCC65/2021

控罪:

Wounding with intent

涉事日期 :

2020-05-24

涉事地點 :

Causeway Bay

判決理由書/裁決書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判決理由書/裁決書為準

No Reasons for Verdict.

判刑理由書撮要(由AI生成)

以下撮要以AI生成及/或翻譯,內容以原來的判刑理由書為準

The judgment states that defendants one to four participated in an unauthorised protest and unlawful assembly on the day of the incident. During this time, protesters erected roadblocks and vandalised shops in the Causeway Bay area, and at the junction of Leighton Road and Caroline Hill Road attacked a lone pedestrian with umbrellas, metal signboards and other hard objects, causing multiple lacerations and contusions to the head and body. The defendants were later arrested and pleaded guilty to unlawful assembly, rioting, and intent to cause grievous bodily harm.

Involving unlawful assembly (maximum five years’ imprisonment), rioting (maximum ten years’ imprisonment) and intent to cause grievous bodily harm (life imprisonment possible). Sentencing must take into account the degree of violence, scale of participation, use of weapons, duration and resulting harm, and should focus on punishment and deterrence.

The protest had features of collective destruction and escalating violence; the victim was surrounded and beaten by multiple assailants, causing injury and seriously undermining public order. However, the defendants were not ringleaders and there were mitigating factors, including guilty pleas, remorse, and family responsibilities.

The judge considered that the defendants acted on impulse and were not habitual offenders, but their conduct clearly fuelled the riot and endangered others’ safety. A deterrent sentence is necessary to uphold the rule of law, while also considering the defendants’ backgrounds and prospects for reform.

Defendant one was sentenced to 34 months’ imprisonment; defendant two to 25 months’ imprisonment; defendant three to 19 months’ imprisonment, to run concurrently; defendant four was sent to a reformatory to serve his sentence, to run concurrently. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

查看完整判刑理由書

Case Details

File No. anti-elab-3012
Case No. DCCC65/2021
Judge Tang Siu-hung Daniel
Court District Court No. 20
Plea Plead guilty
Verdict Convicted
Charge Wounding with intent
Sentence Imprisonment
Incident Date 2020-05-24
Incident Location Causeway Bay
Reasons for Verdict (AI Summary) No Reasons for Verdict.
Reasons for Sentence View
Reasons for Sentence (AI Summary) The judgment states that defendants one to four participated in an unauthorised protest and unlawful assembly on the day of the incident. During this time, protesters erected roadblocks and vandalised shops in the Causeway Bay area, and at the junction of Leighton Road and Caroline Hill Road attacked a lone pedestrian with umbrellas, metal signboards and other hard objects, causing multiple lacerations and contusions to the head and body. The defendants were later arrested and pleaded guilty to unlawful assembly, rioting, and intent to cause grievous bodily harm.</p><p>Involving unlawful assembly (maximum five years' imprisonment), rioting (maximum ten years' imprisonment) and intent to cause grievous bodily harm (life imprisonment possible). Sentencing must take into account the degree of violence, scale of participation, use of weapons, duration and resulting harm, and should focus on punishment and deterrence.</p><p>The protest had features of collective destruction and escalating violence; the victim was surrounded and beaten by multiple assailants, causing injury and seriously undermining public order. However, the defendants were not ringleaders and there were mitigating factors, including guilty pleas, remorse, and family responsibilities.</p><p>The judge considered that the defendants acted on impulse and were not habitual offenders, but their conduct clearly fuelled the riot and endangered others' safety. A deterrent sentence is necessary to uphold the rule of law, while also considering the defendants' backgrounds and prospects for reform.</p><p>Defendant one was sentenced to 34 months' imprisonment; defendant two to 25 months' imprisonment; defendant three to 19 months' imprisonment, to run concurrently; defendant four was sent to a reformatory to serve his sentence, to run concurrently. (Translated from Chinese to English by AI)

裁判官/法官:

Tang Siu-hung Daniel

法院:

District Court No. 20

認罪:

Plead guilty

罪成:

Convicted

判刑:

Imprisonment

相近案件